skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Nocentini, Andrea"

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. Abstract BackgroundPrescribed fire is an essential tool employed by natural resource managers to serve ecological and fuel treatment objectives of fire management. However, limited operational resources, environmental conditions, and competing goals result in a finite number of burn days, which need to be allocated toward maximizing the overall benefits attainable with fire management. Burn prioritization models must balance multiple management objectives at landscape scales, often providing coarse resolution information. We developed a decision-support framework and a burn prioritization model for wetlands and wildland-urban interfaces using high-resolution mapping in Everglades National Park (Florida, USA). The model included criteria relevant to the conservation of plant communities, the protection of endangered faunal species, the ability to safely contain fires and minimize emissions harmful to the public, the protection of cultural, archeological, and recreational resources, and the control of invasive plant species. A geographic information system was used to integrate the multiple factors affecting fire management into a single spatially and temporally explicit management model, which provided a quantitative computations-alternative to decision making that is usually based on qualitative assessments. ResultsOur model outputs were 50-m resolution grid maps showing burn prioritization scores for each pixel. During the 50 years of simulated burn unit prioritization used for model evaluation, the mean burned surface corresponded to 256 ± 160 km2 y−1, which is 12% of the total area within Everglades National Park eligible for prescribed fires. Mean predicted fire return intervals (FRIs) varied among ecosystem types: marshes (9.9 ± 1.7 years), prairies (7.3 ± 1.9 years), and pine rocklands (4.0 ± 0.7 years). Mean predicted FRIs also varied among the critical habitats for species of special concern:Ammodramus maritimus mirabilis(7.4 ± 1.5 years),Anaea troglodyta floridalisandStrymon acis bartramibutterflies (3.9 ± 0.2 years), andEumops floridanus(6.5 ± 2.9 years). While mean predicted fire return intervals accurately fit conservation objectives, baseline fire return intervals, calculated using the last 20 years of data, did not. Fire intensity and patchiness potential indices were estimated to further support fire management. ConclusionsBy performing finer-scale spatial computations, our burn prioritization model can support diverse fire regimes across large wetland landscape such as Everglades National Park. Our model integrates spatial variability in ecosystem types and habitats of endangered species, while satisfying the need to contain fires and protect cultural heritage and infrastructure. Burn prioritization models can allow the achievement of target fire return intervals for higher-priority conservation objectives, while also considering finer-scale fire characteristics, such as patchiness, seasonality, intensity, and severity. Decision-support frameworks and higher-resolution models are needed for managing landscape-scale complexity of fires given rapid environmental changes. 
    more » « less
    Free, publicly-accessible full text available December 1, 2026
  2. Dissolved organic matter (DOM) drives biogeochemical processes in aquatic ecosystems. Yet, how hydrologic restoration in nutrient‐enriched ecosystems changes DOM and the consequences of those changes for the carbon cycle remain unclear. To predict the consequences of hydrologic restoration on carbon cycling in restored wetlands, we need to understand how local environmental factors influence production, processing, and transport of DOM. We collected surface water samples along transects in restored peat (organic‐rich, macrophyte‐dominated) and marl (carbonate, periphyton‐dominated) freshwater marshes in the Everglades (Florida, U.S.A.) that varied in environmental factors (water depth, phosphorus [P] concentrations [water, macrophytes, periphyton, and soil], and primary producer biomass) to understand drivers of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations and DOM composition. Higher water depths led to a “greening” of DOM, due to increasing algal contributions, with decreasing concentrations of DOC in peat wetlands, and a “browning” of DOM, due to increasing humic contributions, with increasing DOC concentrations in marl wetlands. Soil total P was positively correlated with DOC concentrations and microbial contributions to DOM in peat wetlands, and periphyton total P was positively correlated with algal contributions to DOM in marl wetlands. Despite large variations in both vegetation biomass and periphyton biovolume across transects and sites, neither were predictors of DOC concentrations or DOM composition. Hydrologic restoration differentially alters DOM in peat and marl marshes and interacts with nutrient enrichment to shift proportions of green and brown contributions to surface water chemistry, which has the potential to modify wetland food webs, as well as the processing of carbon by micro‐organisms. 
    more » « less
  3. Abstract Degradation of wetland ecosystems results from loss of hydrologic connectivity, nutrient enrichment, and altered fire regimes, among other factors. It is uncertain how drivers of wetland ecosystem processes and wetland vegetation communities interact in reversing the ecological trajectory from degraded to restored conditions. We analyzed biogeochemical and vegetation data collected in wetlands of the Florida Everglades at the start of (2015) and during (2018 and 2021) the initial stages of rehydration. Our objectives were to analyze the allocation of carbon and nutrients among ecosystem compartments and correlated trajectories of vegetation community change following rehydration, to identify the drivers of change, including fire, and analyze macrophyte species‐specific responses to drivers. We expected to see changes in vegetation toward more hydric communities that would differ based on wetland baseline conditions and the magnitude of the hydrologic change. During the study period, both length of inundation and surface water depth increased throughout wetlands in the region, and four fires occurred, which affected 51% of the sampling locations. We observed biogeochemical shifts in the wetland landscape, driven by both hydrology and fire. Total phosphorus concentrations in soil and flocculent detrital material decreased, while soil carbon:phosphorus and nitrogen:phosphorus mass ratios increased at sites further away from water management infrastructure. Transitions in vegetation communities were driven by an increase in hydroperiods and by the distinct changes in nutrient concentrations or soil stoichiometric ratios in each subregion. The abundance of macrophyte species typical of short‐hydroperiod prairies strongly decreased, while dominant long‐hydroperiod species, such asEleocharis cellulosa, expanded. Fire facilitated the expansion of thickly vegetated plumes of invasiveTyphaat sites close to the water inflow sources. Overall, restored hydrology shifted vegetation community composition toward higher abundance of long‐hydroperiod species within six years. In contrast, removal of invasive vegetation controlled by soil phosphorus concentrations will likely require long‐term and interactive restoration strategies. 
    more » « less